<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unexpected Objects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/</link>
	<description>Amateur astrophotography with a Canon 1000D</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=254#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Checking the time stamp on my image the camera reports that it took this frame at 22:56 on the 6th of March, the camera time appears to be fast by around 4 minutes.  Do you reset your camera clock over winter to adjust for GMT? I&#039;ve not thought to change mine so the hour difference could be accounted for there as mine remains permanently set to UTC for no other reason than I forget to change it.

I&#039;m just down in Basingstoke so not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checking the time stamp on my image the camera reports that it took this frame at 22:56 on the 6th of March, the camera time appears to be fast by around 4 minutes.  Do you reset your camera clock over winter to adjust for GMT? I&#8217;ve not thought to change mine so the hour difference could be accounted for there as mine remains permanently set to UTC for no other reason than I forget to change it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just down in Basingstoke so not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Tickner</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Tickner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=254#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Tim

Can you please confirm your timing. Reading AS is getting somewhat obsessed with our two images!  I can time my camera as taking my streak at 11:50 that night, but the camera was 3 minutes slow.  The laptop was running on the right time for the download but a difference of 30  minutes between us for those streaks is beyond the likely range - but they are so identical there has to be a relationship. Same angle and fractionally different in start and end point, as well as displacement (mine is to the West, not East per my first comment).

I&#039;d be grateful if you could email me about this and I&#039;ll send you my image in return.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim</p>
<p>Can you please confirm your timing. Reading AS is getting somewhat obsessed with our two images!  I can time my camera as taking my streak at 11:50 that night, but the camera was 3 minutes slow.  The laptop was running on the right time for the download but a difference of 30  minutes between us for those streaks is beyond the likely range &#8211; but they are so identical there has to be a relationship. Same angle and fractionally different in start and end point, as well as displacement (mine is to the West, not East per my first comment).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be grateful if you could email me about this and I&#8217;ll send you my image in return.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Tickner</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Tickner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=254#comment-107</guid>
		<description>My pleasure.   We both seem to have caught Cosmos 2433.  Looking at my image and superimposing yours on it there is a clear difference from our respective locations, albeit we must have been within 20 miles of each other.  Mine was taken in Lower Earley but the streak appears to start a fraction further on from M65 than yours and is further to the South and East in the same field of view.  

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pleasure.   We both seem to have caught Cosmos 2433.  Looking at my image and superimposing yours on it there is a clear difference from our respective locations, albeit we must have been within 20 miles of each other.  Mine was taken in Lower Earley but the streak appears to start a fraction further on from M65 than yours and is further to the South and East in the same field of view.  </p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=254#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Thanks Peter, I mentioned it to the members of the Basingstoke society who were online at the time but we didn&#039;t have much luck tracking down the source.  Nice to know what it was!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Peter, I mentioned it to the members of the Basingstoke society who were online at the time but we didn&#8217;t have much luck tracking down the source.  Nice to know what it was!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Tickner</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Tickner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=254#comment-100</guid>
		<description>I took an image of the Triplet that night as well using a Canon 7D and a small 70mm ED piggybacked on my larger scope and got the same streak.  The consensus of my local Astronomy club (Reading) is that it is a spinning Cosmos satellite that was predicted in the region at around 11:35pm

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took an image of the Triplet that night as well using a Canon 7D and a small 70mm ED piggybacked on my larger scope and got the same streak.  The consensus of my local Astronomy club (Reading) is that it is a spinning Cosmos satellite that was predicted in the region at around 11:35pm</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
