<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Very Amateur Astronomy &#187; Astrophotography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/category/astrophotography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk</link>
	<description>Amateur astrophotography with a Canon 1000D</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 15:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Re-processed Leo and Bodes</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/15/re-processed-leo-and-bodes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/15/re-processed-leo-and-bodes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve spent some time over the last few evenings working on getting better colour correction and I&#8217;m happy to have made reasonable progress to the point where I have re-processed my last two galaxy images, have a look and see what you think . Both galaxies show much more natural colour than before, and allow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve spent some time over the last few evenings working on getting better colour correction and I&#8217;m happy to have made reasonable progress to the point where I have re-processed my last two galaxy images, have a look and see what you think .</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/bodes-galaxy/bodes2-1.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic70" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/70__400x_bodes2-1.jpg" alt="bodes2-1" title="bodes2-1" />
</a>

<p>Both galaxies show much more natural colour than before, and allow for a greater stretch and a much easier to manage background colour.</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/leo-triplet/leo_triplet_2.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic71" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/71__400x_leo_triplet_2.jpg" alt="leo_triplet_2" title="leo_triplet_2" />
</a>

<p>The same with the Leo triplet, m66 especially is showing more detail in the structure.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very happy with the progress on these two images, thanks to a great deal of assistance from <a href="http://www.johnastro.info">John Murphy</a> in the use of Iris and some very useful directions for taking better flat frames. The next step is to image a g2v type star during imaging session to work as a correct reference for my colour correction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/15/re-processed-leo-and-bodes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Leo Triplet</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/08/the-leo-triplet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/08/the-leo-triplet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit of a work in progress this as I don&#8217;t have enough light frames as yet, but here is the first image from the new mount : The Leo tripet is a small cluster of galaxies sitting next to each each in the constellation Leo, they are M66 (top left), M67 (bottom left) and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of a work in progress this as I don&#8217;t have enough light frames as yet, but here is the first image from the new mount :</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/leo-triplet/leo_triplet_2.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic71" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/71__400x_leo_triplet_2.jpg" alt="leo_triplet_2" title="leo_triplet_2" />
</a>

<p>The Leo tripet is a small cluster of galaxies sitting next to each each in the constellation Leo, they are M66 (top left), M67 (bottom left) and NGC3628 (right).</p>
<p>This is the first image using the new CGEM mount and the second image using the CLS CCD filter and it shows a few problems. Visually the first problem that I see is the colour balance, this is a direct effect of using the new filter which has shifted the colours way over into the blue and I&#8217;m having trouble working out a good method to correct it.</p>
<p>The second problem is the slight stretching of the stars along the RA axis, this is primarily a result of periodic error which I need to work on. I&#8217;ve gone back to using guidedog for guiding on this image as guidemaster was giving me a lot of issues, it still needs a bit of fine tuning. I also want to test out the guiding facilities in EQ Align to see how that deals with the mount.</p>
<p>Also as a direct result on the horrible street light over the garden the images all had an awful amount of gradient in across them, happily however Pixinsight was able to deal with that problem. I&#8217;ll have to remember to stick my big cardboard box over the light next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/08/the-leo-triplet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unexpected Objects</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It always fun to get something unexpected when out imaging, something unexpected in the image that is rather than unexpected things not working. Before I have had planes across the Moon, red and green trails across an image from an airplanes wing lights, the very random trail of an out of focus bug or something zipping around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always fun to get something unexpected when out imaging, something unexpected in the image that is rather than unexpected things not working. Before I have had planes across the Moon, red and green trails across an image from an airplanes wing lights, the very random trail of an out of focus bug or something zipping around high above.</p>
<p>Tonight though I got this whilst imaging the Leo triplet :</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/misc/flare.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic65" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/65__400x_flare.jpg" alt="flare" title="flare" />
</a>

<p>It looks like a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_flare">satellite flare</a> but from which of the many hundreds of objects in orbit I couldn&#8217;t say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/03/06/unexpected-objects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More of the Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/02/01/more-of-the-moon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/02/01/more-of-the-moon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had an entire weekend of clear skies! Unfortunately that means we also had a full moon as apparently the two things are connected these days, or at least that&#8217;s what it feels like. Lacking the ability to take photos of anything else (I need a 4 x Barlow for Mars) I spent a lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had an entire weekend of clear skies! Unfortunately that means we also had a full moon as apparently the two things are connected these days, or at least that&#8217;s what it feels like. Lacking the ability to take photos of anything else (I need a 4 x Barlow for Mars) I spent a lot of time testing guiding with the sphinx.</p>
<p>On the first night I used the excellent <a href="http://eqalign.sourceforge.net/index-en.html">EQAlign</a> to get my polar alignment as close as possible. The guiding after this was massively improved in declination with very few corrections required, probably the best dec guiding I&#8217;ve seen from the sphinx. The RA however was all over the place with very rapid oscillations that the guiding had problems with.</p>
<p>Second night, I spent a lot of time getting the balance of the mount as accurate as possible, had another go with EQAlign to tweak that side then tried again. The result? Excellent RA guiding, but now the declination is a mess showing a slow oscillation as it seems to drift first one way then the other. The horrible declination backlash of the sphinx made this very difficult to manage and adjusting the movement speed or aggression settings only sped up or reduced the oscillation period.</p>
<p>I really like the sphinx, I&#8217;ve had a great time with it and learnt a lot, but I think the time is coming for it to be replaced. It is overloaded these days, and the performance of the mount suffers because of this.</p>
<p>Anyway, before heading to bed on Saturday night I took a stack of 100 images of the full moon through the 250mm reflector.</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/moon/fullmoon-30012010.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic63" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/63__400x_fullmoon-30012010.jpg" alt="fullmoon-30012010" title="fullmoon-30012010" />
</a>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/02/01/more-of-the-moon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M42 Redux</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/01/13/m42-redux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/01/13/m42-redux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I added some additional data to my M42 image, not much to say on it really. The additional data really helps to bring out the fainter nebulosity whilst maintaining good noise control.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added some additional data to my M42 image, not much to say on it really. The additional data really helps to bring out the fainter nebulosity whilst maintaining good noise control.</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/orion-nebula/m42-3.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic62" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/62__400x_m42-3.jpg" alt="m42-3" title="m42-3" />
</a>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/01/13/m42-redux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M81 and M82 &#8211; Bodes Galaxy</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/01/04/m81-and-m82-bodes-galaxy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/01/04/m81-and-m82-bodes-galaxy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had a lovely clear night last night, slightly spoilt by a nearly full moon but not spoilt enough to stop me getting out and doing some images.  I spent some time getting more data for my M42 image which I will hopefully have processed soon, but I also spent some time on M81 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a lovely clear night last night, slightly spoilt by a nearly full moon but not spoilt enough to stop me getting out and doing some images.  I spent some time getting more data for my M42 image which I will hopefully have processed soon, but I also spent some time on M81 and M82.  This was a great test of my guiding setup, I settled for 5 minute exposures at iso800, though I think without the moon I would have been better off at 8 or 10 minutes at iso400. However I am very happy with the result so far, which has been aligned and stacked in Iris and processed in Pixinsight.</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/bodes-galaxy/m81-m82.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic61" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/61__400x_m81-m82.jpg" alt="m81-m82" title="m81-m82" />
</a>

<ul>
<li>Orion Optics 250mm F4.7 Reflector</li>
<li>Vixen Sphinx SX Mount</li>
<li>Baader MPCC</li>
<li>Astronomik CLS CCD Filter</li>
<li>Canon EOS 1000D</li>
<li>24 x 5 Minute exposures at iso800</li>
</ul>
<p>Guiding Setup</p>
<ul>
<li>Vixen A70LF refractor with 0.6x Focal Reducer</li>
<li>Modified SPC900NC</li>
<li>Guidemaster auto guiding software</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2010/01/04/m81-and-m82-bodes-galaxy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>M42 Quick and Dirty</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/29/m42-quick-and-dirty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/29/m42-quick-and-dirty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking any brief window for imaging as I am at present I managed to sneak an our of clear skies to take a few more images of M42. Guiding for once was working very well after adjusting the counter weights a little. I managed about 33 minutes of data. Each frame being 3 minutes at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking any brief window for imaging as I am at present I managed to sneak an our of clear skies to take a few more images of M42. Guiding for once was working very well after adjusting the counter weights a little. I managed about 33 minutes of data. Each frame being 3 minutes at ISO800, aligned  stacked in Deep Sky Stacker and processed in pixinsight. The Moon was nearly full which reduced the image quality and my exposure time. For some reason I had a lot of colour issues when stacking in Iris, probably due to the addition of the CLS CCD filter. I will need to look into how to resolve that in future.</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/orion-nebula/m42.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic58" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/58__400x_m42.jpg" alt="m42" title="m42" />
</a>

<p>A slightly different processing from a stack with different options :</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/orion-nebula/m42_deep3_dbe.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic59" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/59__400x_m42_deep3_dbe.jpg" alt="m42 - 2" title="m42 - 2" />
</a>

<p>Imaging Setup</p>
<ul>
<li>Orion Optics 250mm F4.7 Reflector</li>
<li>Vixen Sphinx SX Mount</li>
<li>Canon EOS 1000D unmodified</li>
<li>Astronomik CLS-CCD Filter</li>
</ul>
<p>Guiding</p>
<ul>
<li>Vixen A70LF F12 Refractor</li>
<li>Modified Phillips SPC900NC webcam</li>
<li>0.6x Focal Reducer</li>
<li>Guidemaster</li>
</ul>
<p>Images</p>
<ul>
<li>11 x 3 minutes @ ISO800</li>
<li>Darks and Flats x 15 each</li>
<li>Aligned and Stacked in Deep Sky Stacker</li>
<li>Processed in Pixinsight</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/29/m42-quick-and-dirty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Successful Guiding</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/07/successful-guiding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/07/successful-guiding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a long road over the summer to get to this point, but I think I finally have this particular nut cracked. This is a single 6 minute frame of the Orion Nebula, unprocessed, washed out by the moon and as it arrived off the camera. I&#8217;m pretty happy with that, it&#8217;s not perfect, there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long road over the summer to get to this point, but I think I finally have this particular nut cracked. This is a single 6 minute frame of the Orion Nebula, unprocessed, washed out by the moon and as it arrived off the camera.</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/orion-nebula/single.jpg" title="A single unprocessed frame of Orion. This was a guide test image taken on the 6th of December 2009." class="shutterset_singlepic57" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/57__400x_single.jpg" alt="Orion guide test" title="Orion guide test" />
</a>

<p>I&#8217;m pretty happy with that, it&#8217;s not perfect, there is a slight stretching of the stars. But this one one of 10 test images and they were all of equal or better quality. The stretch is along the RA direction which means the likely causes are periodic error and over correction by the guide software. The dec axis is working beautifully despite it&#8217;s frustrating backlash.</p>
<p>Experimentation has shown me that the automated aggression control of guidemaster doesn&#8217;t function very well on this mount, disabling that option helped enormously.  Adjusting down the RA autoguide movement speed also reduced the stretch. The next testing step will be to do the PEC recording, however Vixen really need to improve PEC on the starbook, I don&#8217;t want to have to do it every time I want to do some imaging!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/07/successful-guiding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Lunar Imaging</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/04/more-lunar-imaging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/04/more-lunar-imaging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is addition to my previous post really, as I had taken more images that I had not processed on Tuesday night. First off though I found my missing mosaic video section! This means I&#8217;ve been able to complete the image properly now, without the missing chunk. I&#8217;ve also left the colour in and applied [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is addition to my previous post really, as I had taken more images that I had not processed on Tuesday night. First off though I found my missing mosaic video section! This means I&#8217;ve been able to complete the image properly now, without the missing chunk. I&#8217;ve also left the colour in and applied a small gausian blue to smooth off some of the sharper edges.</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/moon/moon3_0.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic56" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/56__400x_moon3_0.jpg" alt="moon3_0" title="moon3_0" />
</a>

<p>The other data I wanted to process was a set of 30 full frame raw format images of the moon taken with the canon 1000D. These were then stacked in registax, tweaked with wavelets and then dumped out to gimp to adjust the colours. In this case I pushed the saturation levels right up, this brings out more of the subtle changes in the moons surface that the human eye really only see&#8217;s in shades of grey but the DSLR picks up.  It&#8217;s an effect that I really enjoy and not possible with the mosaic above where every individual section has it&#8217;s own balance and variation.</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/moon/moon_dslr.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic55" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/55__400x_moon_dslr.jpg" alt="moon_dslr" title="moon_dslr" />
</a>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/04/more-lunar-imaging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lunar imaging with the SPC900NC</title>
		<link>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/02/lunar-imaging-with-the-spc900nc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/02/lunar-imaging-with-the-spc900nc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astrophotography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had a clear night! No joking, it was clear, in England all night on the 30th, and properly cold as well. It&#8217;s been so long since we had a good clear night that I had the roof off the shed just as soon as I could get out outside. The only real damper on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a clear night!</p>
<p>No joking, it was clear, in England all night on the 30th, and properly cold as well. It&#8217;s been so long since we had a good clear night that I had the roof off the shed just as soon as I could get out outside. The only real damper on this otherwise perfect evening was a big bright moon, which of course ruined any chance of me doing any deep space work. But I have a webcam, and I have EOS movie record, so I figured I would make the best of the night and try my hand at some lunar imaging.</p>
<p>The first thing I wanted to try was capturing a few minutes of video from the Canon 1000D using <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/eos-movrec/">EOS Movie Record</a>. I set that up and left it running whilst I got myself sorted for the night. A few minutes in I noticed a flicker on the screen from the corner of my eye and made a mental note to check it the next day. This is what I found when I reviewed the video :</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff;">
<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/moon/moon-silloette.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic48" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/48__400x_moon-silloette.jpg" alt="moon-silloette" title="moon-silloette" />
</a>
</span></p>
<p>So that was a bit of pure luck on my part, but it makes for a striking image I think.</p>
<p>Next I setup the webcam on the 250mm reflector to try my hand at lunar imaging. At first I thought I would just stick to one area but after a little while I had started to collect connected sections, and from then on it turned into an attempt at a mosaic. This was my first attempt doing this and unplanned so naturally I missed a bit, which I shall kick myself for later.</p>

<a href="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/moon/moon2.jpg" title="" class="shutterset_singlepic50" >
	<img class="ngg-singlepic" src="http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/wp-content/gallery/cache/50__400x_moon2.jpg" alt="moon2" title="moon2" />
</a>

<ul>
<li>Philips NPC900NC</li>
<li>Baader UV/IR cut filter</li>
<li>Orion Optics 250mm reflector</li>
</ul>
<p>The image is composed of 27 individual frames, each of which came from a 1000 frame avi video, the data was captured with <a href="http://www.pk3.org/Astro/index.htm?k3ccdtools.htm">k3ccdtools</a> and stacked in <a href="http://www.astronomie.be/registax/">Registax</a>.</p>
<p>In order to build the complete image I first spent a long time in photoshop and came out with something I was happy with. Then out of interest I tried the photostitch tool in <a href="http://download.live.com/photogallery">Windows live photo gallery</a>. In about three minutes it had aligned, colour corrected and stitched the whole image together far better than I ever could. I was really impressed as about a third of the frames were at an angle compared to the rest due to the scope reversing half way through. So if you have images to align, give it a go, you don&#8217;t need to do anything more than select the images and click go, it works out everything else by itself.</p>
<p>The full scale image is some 3360 pixels across and I shall locate some hosting for that soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.veryamateur.co.uk/2009/12/02/lunar-imaging-with-the-spc900nc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
